.jpg)
|
.gif)
|
|
|
||
|
Public Notice Printed In: Daily Territorial (Tucson) Printed On: 2026/01/09 Public Notice:
MEETING NOVEMBER 12, 2025 The Pima County Board of Supervisors met in regular session at the regular meeting place of the Pima County Board of Supervisors on the First Floor of the Administration Building of the Governmental Center, Tucson, Arizona, at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, November 12, 2002. Up- on roll call, those present and absent were as follows: Present: Sharon Bronson, Chair Richard Elias, Vice Chair Ray Carroll, Member Ann Day, Member Lori Godoshian, Clerk Absent: Dan Eckstrom, Member REGULAR AGENDA 1. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Reverend Mary Jane Lyon of Hope United Methodist Church. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE All present joined in the Pledge of Allegiance. ... EXECUTIVE SESSIONS On consideration, it was moved by Supervi- sor Elias, seconded by Chair Bronson, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, that the Board convene to Executive Session at 9:07 a.m. relating to: A. Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(3) and (4), for legal advice and direction to request ap- proval of a tax appeal settlement recommenda- tion on 12 parcels that make up the Green Val- ley Mall, Parcel Numbers 304-21-119P, 304-21-119M, 304-21-119J, 304-21-119G, 304-21-119B, 304-21-118O, 304-21-117O, 304-21-116M, 304-21-116L, 304-21-116K, 304-21-116E, 304-21-116B. B. Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(3) and (4), for legal advice and direction to request ap- proval of a tax appeal settlement recommenda- tion on Parcel Numbers 117-20-019A and 117-20-019B, known as the Radisson Downtown Con- vention Hotel. C. Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(3) and (4), for legal advice and direction to request ap- proval to file a lawsuit in the matter of Broad- way Hotel One, L.L.C., Parcel No. 127-01-002B. D. Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(3) and (4), for legal advice and direction regarding briefing and direction on Superior Court Case No. C20021867, Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw and Villamana, P.C. v. Pima County, Arizona. ADDENDUM E. Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(3) and (4), for legal advice and direction to authorize settlement on the following two indigent health care lawsuits: Carondelet v. Pima County, No. 329252 Carondelet v. Pima County, No. 335070 REGULAR AGENDA 3. RECONVENE The Board of Supervisors reconvened at 9:30 a.m. All members were present. 4. LITIGATION Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(3) and (4), for legal advice and direction regarding brief- ing and direction on Superior Court Case No. C20021867, Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw and Villamana, P.C. v. Pima County, Arizona. Chuck Huckelberry, County Administrator, stat- ed he would defer to Mr. Tom Slutes to address the Board as to how he would proceed with this case. Tom Slutes, outside attorney representing Pima County, stated he would proceed with this case as discussed in executive session. On consideration, it was moved by Supervi- sor Elias, seconded by Chair Bronson, and unanimously carry by a four to zero vote, to ac- cept the attorney's recommendation as dis- cussed in executive session. 5. LITIGATION Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(3) and (4), for legal advice and direction to request approv- al of a tax appeal settlement recommendation on 12 parcels that make up the Green Valley Mall, Parcel Numbers 304-21-119P, 304-21-119M, 304-21-119J, 304-21-119G, 304-21-119B, 304-21-118O, 304-21-117O, 304-21-116M, 304- 21-116L, 304-21-116K, 304-21-116E, 304-21-116B. Katharina Richter, Chief Civil Deputy County Attorney, reported this case dealt with the prop- erty assessment for the year 2002, in which the property was assessed at $9,013,000.00, and the owner of the Green Valley Mall is appeal- ing. The property owner submitted a letter stat- ing the mall's income had decreased due to the loss of major tenants. Therefore, the County Attorney's Office is recommending a settlement in the amount of $6,587,808.00. On consideration, it was moved by Supervi- sor Elias, seconded by Supervisor Carroll, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to ac- cept the County Attorney's recommendation in the settlement amount of $6,587,808.00. 6. LITIGATION Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(3) and (4), for legal advice and direction to request approv- al of a tax appeal settlement recommendation on Parcel Numbers 117-20-019A and 117-20-019B, known as the Radisson Downtown Con- vention Hotel. Katharina Richter, Chief Civil Deputy County Attorney, reported this was also tax appeal case where the property owner provided the As- sessor's Office with proof that the income on the property had gone down. The County Attor- ney's Office and the Assessor's Office recom- mended a full cash value settlement in the amount of $6,140,000.00. On consideration, it was moved by Supervi- sor Elias, seconded by Supervisor Carroll, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to ac- cept the County Attorney's recommendation in the settlement amount of $6,140,000.00. 7. LITIGATION Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(3) and (4), for legal advice and direction to request approv- al to file a lawsuit in the matter of Broadway Ho- tel One, L.L.C., Parcel No. 127-01-002B. Katharina Richter, Chief Civil Deputy County Attorney, stated the Assessor had assessed the Viscount Hotel property for the fiscal year 2003, at 9,720,000.00. The State Board of Equaliza- tion lowered the amount to $4,471,410.00. The County Attorney's Office is seeking authoriza- tion to appeal this decision. On consideration, it was moved by Supervi- sor Elias, seconded by Supervisor Carroll, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to au- thorize the County Attorney's Office to appeal the State Board of Equalization's decision. ADDENDUM 8. LITIGATION Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(3) and (4), for legal advice and direction to authorize settle- ment on the following two indigent health care lawsuits: Carondelet v. Pima County, No. 329252 Carondelet v. Pima County, No. 335070 Katharina Richter, Chief Civil Deputy County Attorney, reported these were the last two re- maining indigent health care cases which Pima County is responsible for. The statute has been amended making the State of Arizona responsi- ble for indigent health care cases. Ms. Richter stated the total claim from Carondelet was $1,893,014.00 and the County Attorney's Office has negotiated a settlement for the amount $72,500.00. On consideration, it was moved by Supervi- sor Elias, seconded by Supervisor Carroll, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to ac- cept the County Attorney's recommendation for the settlement amount of $72,500.00. REGULAR AGENDA 9. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: REZON- ING The Board of Supervisors on September 17, 2002, continued the following to this date: Co9-02-05, 1601 INA L.L.C. - INA ROAD RE- ZONING Request of 1601 Ina L.L.C., represented by AMEC Infrastructure, for a rezoning of 6.83 acres from SR (Suburban Ranch) to TR (Transitional) located on the south side of Ina Road, approxi- mately 1,200 feet west of La Canada Drive. The proposed rezoning conforms to the Pima County Comprehensive Plan Co7-00-20. On motion, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 (Commissioners Hirsch, Poulos and Williams were absent) to recommend APPROV- AL WITH CONDITIONS. Staff recommends APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS and stan- dard and special requirements. (District 1) Without objection, the item was continued to the Board of Supervisors meeting of January 14, 2003. 10. PIMA COUNTY NATURAL RE- SOURCES, PARKS AND RECREATION: REZONING The Board of Supervisors on September 17, 2002, continued the following to this date: Co9-02-06, 1601 INA L.L.C. - INA ROAD NO. 2 REZONING Request of 1601 Ina L.L.C., represented by AMEC Infrastructure, for a rezoning of 2.76 acres from SR (Suburban Ranch) to CR-1 (Single Res- idence), located on the south side of Ina Road approximately 1,100 feet west of La Canada Drive. The proposed rezoning conforms to the Pima County Comprehensive Plan Co7-00-20. On motion, the Planning and Zoning Commis- sion voted 6-0 (Commissioners Membrila, Poulos and Williams were absent) to recom- mend APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS. Staff recommends APPROVAL WITH CONDI- TIONS and standard and special require- ments. (District 1) Without objection, the item was continued to the Board of Supervisors meeting of January 14, 2003. 11. PRESENTATION A. Presentation to the Board of Supervisors by the Tucson-Pima Arts Council regarding "Cul- tural Corridors of Pima County" and "Ponies del Pueblo." ADDENDUM B. Request of the Tucson Pima Arts Council for the Board of Supervisors to sponsor two po- nies in the Ponies Del Pueblo Project. Sponsor- ships are $6,000.00 per pony. Richard Fimbres, Tucson Pima Arts Council Board Member, thanked the Board for their sup- port and stated he looks forward to working with the Board in the future on strengthening and promoting the diverse cultural assets of Pima County. Pima County's support of arts and cultural development has enabled pro- grams to be available for children and families. Many programs offered by the Pima Arts Coun- cil are the only exposure that many children have to the arts. The cultural corridors of Pima County are an example of the types of work that the Pima Arts Council would like to contin- ue to promote throughout Pima County and the cultural tourist destination. Maryann Ingenthron, Executive Director, gave a brief presentation on the Cultural Corri- dors and the "Ponies de Pueblo." Albert Soto, Development Director, stated the "Ponies de Pueblo" are similar to projects in oth- er states with Pima County deciding to you use ponies as their symbol. The goal of this project is to attract tourism to Tucson and, by the Board sponsoring two ponies, it would help showcase Arizona artists and assist Pima County non-prof- it organizations. Mr. Soto would appreciate the Board's sponsorship of two ponies and have them placed within Pima County. On consideration, it was moved by Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor Carroll, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to ap- prove the sponsorship of two ponies with one of the artists being from Las Artes. 12. CONSENT CALENDAR: The Chair inquired if anyone wished to be heard on any items regarding the Consent Cal- endar. No one appeared. On consideration, it was moved Supervisor Carroll, seconded by Supervisor Elias, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to ap- prove the consent calendar as presented. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS ARE AS FOLLOWS: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR - PROCUR- EMENT: AGREEMENTS, CONTRACTS AND/OR AMENDMENTS A. RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 280 , approving an Intergovernmental Agreement with the City of Tucson, to provide for the El Cortez Heights Neighborhood Capital Improvement Project, Capital Improvement Bond Fund, contract amount $150,000.00 (01-30-T-131528-1102) Of- fice of Youth, Families and Neighborhood Rein- vestment B. RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 281 , approving an Intergovernmental Agreement with Cochise County, to provide for a household hazardous waste collection and disposal services, Cochise County Fund, contract amount- rei- mbursement for actual costs (01-51-C-131532-1102) Environmental Quality C. RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 282 , approving an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Town of Sahuarita Police Department, to provide for the States Domestic Preparedness Equipment Program, Department of Justice Grant Fund, con- tract amount $366.00 (01-01-S-131474-0502) Health Department C-1. RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 283 , approv- ing an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Northwest Fire District, to provide for the devel- opment and enhancement of bio-terrorism re- sponse in accordance with the Centers for Dis- ease Control, Bio-Terrorism Preparedness and Response Grant Fund, contract amount not to ex- ceed $25,000.00 (01-01-N-131502-0902) Health Department C-2. RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 284 , approv- ing an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Avra Valley Fire District, to provide for the devel- opment and enhancement of bio-terrorism re- sponse in accordance with the Centers for Dis- ease Control, Bio-Terrorism Preparedness and Response Grant Fund, contract amount not to ex- ceed $5,000.00 (01-01-A-131514-0902) Health Department C-3. RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 285 , approv- ing an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Why Fire District, to provide for the develop- ment and enhancement of bio-terrorism re- sponse in accordance with the Centers for Dis- ease Control, Bio-Terrorism Preparedness and Response Grant Fund, contract amount not to ex- ceed $5,000.00 (01-01-W-131540-0902) Health Department C-4. RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 286 , approv- ing an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Three Points Fire District, to provide for the de- velopment and enhancement of bio-terrorism re- sponse in accordance with the Centers for Dis- ease Control, Bio-Terrorism Preparedness and Response Grant Fund, contract amount not to ex- ceed $5,000.00 (01-01-T-131553-0902) Health Department C-5. RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 287, approv- ing an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Golder Ranch Fire District, to provide for the de- velopment and enhancement of bio-terrorism re- sponse in accordance with the Centers for Dis- ease Control, Bio-Terrorism Preparedness and Response Grant Fund, contract amount not to ex- ceed $25,000.00 (01-01-G-131554-0902) Health Department D. RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 288 , approving an Intergovernmental Agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney's Office, to provide for the purchase of equipment for the An- ti-Terrorism Task Force, Federal Fund, estimat- ed contract amount $20,000.00 revenue (01-11-U-131516-1102) Sheriff D-1. RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 289 , approv- ing an Intergovernmental Agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice, to provide computer equipment, COPS MORE02 Award Grant Fund, contract amount $1,000,000.00 revenue (01-11-U-131529-0802) Sheriff D-2. RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 290 , approv- ing an Intergovernmental Agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice, to provide for four (4) School Resource Officers, Federal Grant and General Fund, contract matching amount $59,148.00 and contract revenue amount $500,000.00 (01-11-U-131551-0902) Sheriff E. RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 291 , approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Pima County Recorder's Office and Pima Coun- ty School Superintendent Office, to provide for the use of registration rolls and related election services for school district elections, Various School District Funds, contract amount $25,000.00 revenue (01-38-P-131501-0702) Superintendent of Schools * * * * F. Danna Rahn Ltd., Partnership II, Amend- ment No. 1, to provide for a release of lien, no cost (13-39-D-115698-0292) Community Servic- es F-1. Moisture Prevention Systems, Inc., Amendment No. 3, to provide roofing services, extend contract term to 8/12/03 and amend scope of work, no cost (11-39-M-126737-0899) Community Services F-2. Family Housing Resources, Inc., Amend- ment No. 1, to provide closing cost/down pay- ment assistance and extend contract term to 6/30/03, no cost (07-39-F-129994-1101) Commu- nity Services F-3. Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc., to provide down payment/closing cost assistance, Federal Home Program Fund, contract amount not to exceed $50,000.00 (11-39-C-131531-1002) Community Services F-4. Chicanos Por la Causa, Inc., to provide a subordination agreement for real property, no cost (11-39-C-131538-1102) Community Servic- es F-5. Chicanos Por la Causa, Inc., to provide a subordination agreement for real property, no cost (11-39-C-131539-1102) Community Servic- es G. Greeley and Hansen, L.L.C., Amendment No. 1, to provide expert litigation services re- garding the Wastewater Interceptor Break, WWM Management Operating Fund Risk Manage- ment/Tort Fund, contract amount $35,000.00 (07-02-G-131433-0902) County Attorney H. Amphi-Plaza Management, Amendment No. 1, to provide a lease agreement for Community Services One-Stop Division and amend scope of work, WIA Grant Fund, no cost (04-13-A-127293-0400) Facilities Management H-1 Express Tel, Amendment No. 1, to pro- vide PBX and non-PBX long distance tele- phone services and extend contract term to 11/4/03, Internal Service Fund, contract amount $150,000.00 (11-13-E-129991-1101) Facilities Management H-2 Durazo Construction Corporation, Amend- ment No. 1, to provide as-needed remodeling and construction services and extend contract term to 10/8/03, General Fund, contract amount $300,000.00 (03-13-D-130033-1001) Facilities Management H-3 Sandpiper Construction, Inc., Amend- ment No. 1, to provide as-needed remodeling and construction services and extend contract term to 10/8/03, General Fund, contract amount $400,000.00 (03-13-S-130095-1001) Facilities Management H-4 Advance Controls Corporation, Amend- ment No. 3, to provide energy management and temperature control systems services, ex- tend contract term to 11/5/03 and amend scope of work, General Fund, contract amount $196,800.00 (10-13-A-130147-1101) Facilities Management H-5 Amendment No. 1. to provide as-needed architectural services for Category 017-Com- mercial Building, extend contract term to 12/3/03 and amend scope of work, General Fund, $150,000.00 each, Facilities Management, for the following: Vendors Contract Welman Sperides Mickelberg. 15-13-W-130255-1201 Architects, P.L.C. Durrant 15-13-D-130277-1201 Poster Frost Associates, Inc. 15-13-P-130285-1201 M3 Engineering Technology Corp. 15-13-M-130286-1201 Earl Kai Chann Associates, LTD. 15-13-E-130311-1201 Erikson Leader Associates 15-13-E-130312-1201 Architects, Inc. The Architecture Company 15-13-A-130320-1201 H-6 CDG Architects, Amendment No. 1, to pro- vide as-needed architectural services for Cate- gory 048-Hospitals and Medical Facilities, ex- tend contract term to 12/3/03 and amend scope of work, General Fund, contract amount $150,000.00 (15-13-C-130257-1201) Facilities Management H-7 Amendment No. 1, to provide as-needed architecture services for Category 047-Histori- cal Preservation, extend contract term to 12/3/03 and amend scope of work, General Fund, $150,000.00 each, Facilities Management, for the following: Vendors Contract CDG Architects 15-13-C-130258-1201 Poster Frost Associates, Inc. 15-13-P-130287-1201 The Architecture Company 15-13-A-130321-1201 H-8 Amendment No. 1, to provide as-needed architecture services for Category 055-Interior Design and Space Planning, extend contract term to 12/3/03 and amend scope of work, Gen- eral Fund, $150,000.00 each, Facilities Manage- ment, for the following: Vendors Contract Durrant 15-13-D-130278-1201 The Architecture Company 15-13-A-130322-1201 H-9 Smitthipong and Rosamond Associates, Inc., Amendment No. 1, to provide as-needed ar- chitecture services for Category 058-Laborato- ries, extend contract term to 12/3/03, and amend scope of work, General Fund, contract amount $150,000.00 (15-13-S-130345-1201) Facilities Management H-10 Amendment No. 1, to provide as-need- ed architectural services for Category 089-Reha- bilitation, extend contract term to 12/3/03 and amend scope of work, General Fund, $150,000.00 each, Facilities Management, for the following: Vendors Contract Earl Kai Chann Associates LTD. 15-13-E-130253-1201 Welman Sperides, Mickelberg 15-13-W-130254-1201 Architects, P.L.C. CDG Architects 15-13-C-130259-1201 Durrant 15-13-D-130279-1201 M3 Engineering Technology Corp. 03-13-M-130283-1201 Poster Frost Associates, Inc. 15-13-P-130284-1201 The Architecture Company 15-13-A-130323-1201 The Hanson Group 15-13-H-130367-1201 I. Quality Care Animal Hospital, Amendment No. 1, to provide veterinarian services and ex- tend contract term to 12/12/03, Health Fund, con- tract amount $120,000.00 (20-01-Q-131350-1201) Health Department I-1 Elephant Head Volunteer Fire Department, to provide for authorized equipment purchases under the State Domestic Preparedness Equip- ment Program, Department of Justice Grant Fund, contract amount not to exceed $2,000.00 (11-01-E-131500-0502) Health Department I-2 Ajo/Gibson Volunteer Fire District, to pro- vide for the development and enhancement of bio-terrorism response in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control, Bio-Terrorism Pre- paredness and Response Grant Fund, contract amount not to exceed $5,000.00 (11-01-A-131512-0902) Health Department I-3 Department of Health and Human Services, to provide for substance abuse services under the Community Academy Program of Sub- stance Abuse Enhancement Project, Communi- ty Academy Grant Fund, contract amount $502,993.00 revenue (02-01-H-131519-0902) Health Department J Community Partnership of Southern Arizo- na, to provide for behavioral health services at the Pima County Juvenile Detention Center, General Fund, contract amount $250,000.00 rev- enue (11-65-C-131515-0702) Institutional Health K Marana Unified School District, Amend- ment No. 1, to provide transportation services for summer recreation programs to special recre- ational sites and amend scope of work, Gener- al Fund, contract amount $100,000.00 (01-05-M- 121889-0796) Natural Resources, Parks and Recreation L Hospice Family Care, Inc., Amendment No. 4, to provide hospice services and amend scope of work, PHCS Enterprise Fund, contract amount $100,000.00 (07-15-H-127202-0200) Pima Health System L-1 Old Pueblo Anesthesia, Amendment No. 2, to provide anesthesia services and amend scope of work, PHCS Enterprise Fund, contract amount $100,000.00 (07-15-O-127440-0500) Pima Health System L-2 Dependable Home Health, Inc., Amend- ment No. 4, to provide home health care servic- es and amend scope of work, PHCS Enterprise Fund, no cost (11-15-D-128174-0800) Pima Health System L-3 COPE Behavioral Services, Inc., Amend- ment No. 5, to provide behavioral management and residential treatment services and amend scope of work, PHCS Enterprise Fund, no cost (11-15-C-128511-0101) Pima Health System L-4 The Blake Foundation, Amendment No. 3, to provide habilitative and residential services including behavioral health management and in- dividual and family therapy services, PHCS En- terprise Fund, contract amount $125,000.00 (11-15-B-128522-1200) Pima Health System L-5 Lantana Home and Community Services, Amendment No. 3, to provide behavioral health services and amend scope of work, PHCS En- terprise Fund, contract amount $300,000.00 (11-15-L-129782-1001) Pima Health System L-6 Evercare At Home, Amendment No. 2, to provide homecare services for rural geograph- ic service areas, extend contract term to 9/30/03 and amend scope of work, PHCS Enter- prise Fund, contract amount $550,000.00 (11-15-L-129954-1001) Pima Health System L-7 Janet Brown, M.A., R.D., Amendment No. 4, to provide dietary consulting services for Posada del Sol Healthcare Center, PHCS Enter- prise Fund, contract amount $7,500.00 (07-15-B-129963-1001) Pima Health System L-8 Portable X-Ray of Arizona, Amendment No. 1, to provide mobile radiology/electrocardio- gram services and amend scope of work, PHCS Enterprise Fund, contract amount $75,000.00 (07-15-P-130192-1001) Pima Health System L-9 United Healthcare Services, Inc., d.b.a. Evercare, Amendment No. 1, to provide Medi- care covered medical services and amend scope of work, PHCS Enterprise Fund, no cost (11-15-E-130769-0702) Pima Health System L-10 SunScript Pharmacy Corporation, to pro- vide pharmaceutical goods and services for Posada del Sol Healthcare Center, PHCS Enter- prise Fund, contract amount not to exceed $300,000.00 (07-15-S-131476-1002) Pima Health System M Sahuaro Girl Scout Council, Inc., to provide an acquisition agreement for real property locat- ed at 3101 North Sabino Canyon Road, Tax Par- cel No. 114-39-116A for the Tanque Verde Sew- er Interceptor, Wastewater Management Capi- tal Improvement Fund, contract amount $34,200.00 plus closing costs (22-64-S-131527-1102) Real Property M-1 Mary Murphy, wife of James P. Carafas, to provide an acquisition agreement for real property located at 5081 N. Kolb Road, Tax Par- cel No. 114-13-0700, Transportation Bond Fund, contract amount not to exceed $164,900.00 including closing costs (22-64-M-131548-1102) Real Property M-2 Citizens Publishing Company, Star Pub- lishing Company, et al., to provide an acquisi- tion agreement for the development of the Stone Office Towers Project, Tax Parcel No. 117-16-0180, General Fund, contract amount not to exceed $427,655.50 including closing costs (22-64-C-131549-1102) Real Property M-3 Office of National Drug Control Policy, Amendment No. 8, to provide for participation in the Southwest Border Alliance Program and extend contract term to 12/31/02, H.I.D.T.A. VII Federal Grant, no cost (01-11-O-124037-1097) Sheriff N A.B. Dick Products Company of Tucson, Amendment No. 3, to provide copier manage- ment program services and amend scope of work, General Fund, contract amount $3,000.00 (11-11-A-128272-1100) Sheriff N-1 Arizona Department of Public Safety, Amendment No. 3, to provide for participation in the Southwest Border Alliance Program and extend contract term to 12/31/02, H.I.D.T.A. XI Federal Grant Fund, no cost (01-11-A-128864-1000) Sheriff N-2 Youngtown Police Department, Amend- ment No. 2, to provide for participation in the Southwest Border Alliance Program and ex- tend contract term to 3/31/03, H.I.D.T.A. XI Feder- al Grant Fund, no cost (01-11-O-128917-1000) Sheriff N-3 Tucson Police Department, Amendment No. 1, to provide for participation in the South- west Border Alliance Program and extend con- tract term to 12/31/02, H.I.D.T.A. XI Federal Grant Fund, no cost (01-11-T-129207-1000) Sheriff N-4 Youngtown Police Department, Amend- ment No. 1, to provide for participation in the Southwest Border Alliance Program and ex- tend contract term to 6/30/03, H.I.D.T.A. XII Fed- eral Grant Fund, no cost (01-11-Y-130622-1001) Sheriff O Sundt Construction, Inc., Amendment No. 4, to provide for the Skyline Drive Widening Pro- ject and amend scope of work, Capital Improve- ment Bond Fund, no cost (03-04-S-130716-0602) Transportation O-1 Granite Construction Company, Change Order No. 4, to provide for the La Cholla Blvd. Im- provements: Omar Drive to Magee Road and amend scope of work, Capital Improvement Bond Fund, contract amount $107,050.00 (03-04-G-130510-0302) Transportation P Camp, Dresser and McKee, Amendment No. 11, to provide for the Ina Road WPCF Pro- cess Change and Expansion Final Design Phase and extend contract term to 2/28/05, Wastewater System Development Fund, no cost (16-03-C-119569-1194) Wastewater Man- agement P-1 R. S. Engineering, Amendment No. 6, to provide for the Tanque Verde Interceptor: Tuc- son Country Club to Craycroft Road and Hid- den Hills Wash to Arbor Circle and extend con- tract term to 12/31/03, Wastewater Manage- ment System Development Fund, no cost (16-03-R-125129-0998) Wastewater Management RATIFICATION OF AGREEMENTS EXECUT- ED PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 2000-76 A Josephine V. Mendez, Amendment No. 2, to provide a release of lien, no cost (13-39-M-115748-0292) Community Services A-1 Scott C. and Robin A. Bradley, Amend- ment No. 3, to provide home repair services and subordination agreement for real property, no cost (13-39-B-119480-0994) Community Ser- vices A-2 Information and Referral Services, Inc., Amendment No. 1, to provide workforce develop- ment services and extend contract term to 6/30/03, WIA Grant Fund, no cost (11-39-I-130559-0402) Community Services A-3 Craig Snow, Inc., to provide consultant ser- vices, CDBG Grant Fund, contract amount $5,000.00 (07-39-S-131493-1002) Community Services A-4 Teena Jo Neal, to provide training, edit- ing and compiling materials for the production of "Movement Magazine," YO Grant Fund, con- tract amount not to exceed $9,000.00 (11-39-N-131505-0702) Community Services A-5 Virginia Novak, to provide counseling ser- vices to participants in Workforce Development Programs, WIA, WTW, YO Grant and General Funds, contract amount not to exceed $9,000.00 (11-39-N-131506-0802) Community Services A-6 Suzanne Savage-Nay, to provide substi- tute instructional services for Pima Vocational High School, General Fund, contract amount not to exceed $5,000.00 (07-39-N-131513-0702) Community Services A-7 Kevin Law, to provide substitute instruction- al services for Pima Vocational High School, General Fund, contract amount not to exceed $1,200.00 (07-39-L-131525-0702) Community Services A-8 Herman Warrior, to provide consultant ser- vices in developing and evaluating the educa- tional programs at the Pima Vocational High School, Arizona State Grant Fund, contract amount not to exceed $35,000.00 (11-39-W-131526-0702) Community Services A-9 John G. Romero, to provide for a release of lien, no cost (11-39-R-131530-1102) Community Services B Pacific Health Policy Group, to provide con- sultant services, General Fund, contract amount not to exceed $4,950.00 (07-30-P-131490-0902) County Administrator C Credit Data Southwest, Amendment No. 2, to provide credit bureau services and extend contract term to 10/15/03, Special Revenue Fund, contract amount $2,000.00 (11-02-C-128325-1000) County Attorney C-1 Richard J. Michela, Amendment No. 1, to provide legal services and extend contract term to 9/30/03, General Fund, no cost (17-02-M-130165-1001) County Attorney C-2 Western Technologies, Inc. to provide expert litigation services regarding the Wastewater Interceptor break on West Speed- way at Melrose Street, Risk Management/Tort Fund, contract amount not to exceed $35,000.00 (07-02-W-131521-0902) County Attorney D Nationwide Paging, Inc., Amendment No. 1, to provide for a license agreement for the instal- lation of an antenna on the Legal Services Building and extend contract term to 10/31/03, contract amount $2,520.00 revenue (11-13-N-130077-1101) Facilities Management D-1 Richard E. Lambert, Ltd., Change Order No. 3, to provide for the Pima County Records Center Project and amend scope of work, Capi- tal Improvement Fund, contract amount $14,361.00 (03-13-R-130170-1201) Facilities Management D-2 Sundance Design and Construction, Change Order No. 3, to provide for the Drexel Heights Community Center Project and amend scope of work, Capital Improvement Bond Fund, contract amount $1,367.00 (03-13-S-130348-0102) Facilities Management D-3 Smith/Woods Contracting, Change Order No. 4, to provide for the Kino Public Health Cen- ter Site Project and amend scope of work, Gen- eral Obligation and 2002 HURF Bond Funds, contract amount $18,728.00 (03-13-S-130447-0202) Facilities Management D-4 Merit Builders, Inc., Change Order No. 4, to provide for the Wastewater Management Out- lying Headquarters Building and amend scope of work, Wastewater Operating and Capital Im- provement Funds, contract amount $8,097.00 (03-13-M-130466-0202) Facilities Management D-5 Sundance Design and Construction, Change Order No. 3, to provide for the Legal Services Building 2nd and 19th Floor Tenant Im- provement Project and amend scope of work, General Obligation Bond Fund, contract amount $3,467.00 (03-13-S-130572-0302) Fa- cilities Management D-6 Worthy Communications, d.b.a. Tad Enter- prises, to provide a telecommunications system for public health nursing facility, Special Reve- nue Fund, contract amount not to exceed $26,000.00 (10-13-T-131545-1002) Facilities Management D-7 Empire Southwest, L.L.C., to provide for the repair and maintenance of generators at the Juvenile Court, Kino Hospital and Downtown Buildings, General Fund, contract amount not to exceed $35,000.00 (10-13-E-131555-1002) Facilities Management E Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona, to provide research, development and implementation of prenatal, childbirth and postpartum education, County Prenatal Block Grant Fund, contract amount not to exceed $4,800.00 (07-01-P-131445-0702) Health Department E-1 Child and Family Resources, Inc., to pro- vide for the Adelante, Nuestro Futuro Confer- ence, General Fund, contract amount not to ex- ceed $5,000.00 (11-01-C-131475-1002) Health Department E-2 Rincon Communications, to provide after hours phone answering services, Health Fund, contract amount not to exceed $6,500.00 (11-01-R-131520-0702) Health Department E-3 Tucson Clinica Medica Familiar, to provide for breast and cervical cancer screening servic- es, Health Fund, contract amount not to exceed $21,461.00 (18-01-T-131523-1002) Health De- partment E-4 Arizona Board of Regents, to provide for a Nursing Conference on Bio-Terrorism, Bio-Terrorism Preparedness and Response Grant Fund, contract amount not to exceed $16,000.00 (11-01-A-131524-0802) Health Department F M. Anderson Construction, Change Order No. 3, to provide Miscellaneous Park Play- grounds 2002 and amend contract term to be 179 calendar days after the date of the Notice to Proceed, Capital Improvement Bond Fund, no cost (03-05-M-130609-0402) Natural Re- sources, Parks and Recreation F-1 Gale W. Bundrick, L.L.C., to provide as-needed management services, General Fund, con- tract amount not to exceed $25,000.00 (07-05-B- 131507-0702) Natural Resources, Parks and Recreation G Kevin Goeta-Kreisler, M.D., to provide psy- chiatry services, PHCS Enterprise Fund, con- tract amount not to exceed $35,000.00 (18-15-K- 131477-1002) Pima Health System G-2 Hossain Nasry, D.D.S., to provide dental services, PHCS Enterprise Fund, contract amount not to exceed $35,000.00 (18-15-N-131510-1002) Pima Health System G-3 Inna Genovker, to provide bilingual inter- preter services, PHCS Enterprise Fund, con- tract amount not to exceed $14,000.00 (07-15-G-131511-1102) Pima Health System H Journal Broadcast Group, Inc., to provide property lease agreement for a radio tower an- tenna, contract amount $23,600.00 revenue, (04-64-J-131483-0902) Real Property H-1 Tucson Full Gospel Church, to provide an acquisition agreement for a sewer ease- ment located at 3160 North Craycroft Road, Tax Parcel No. 109-22-021G, Tanque Verde Sewer Interceptor, WWM Capital Improvement Fund, contract amount not to exceed $11,200.00 including closing costs (22-64-T-131550-1002) Real Property I Saguaro Environmental Services, Amend- ment No. 1, to provide weekly garbage pick-up services at Mount Lemmon Wastewater Treat- ment Facility, extend contract term to 8/31/03, amend scope of work, and request an assign- ment of all rights, duties and obligations to Re- public Services of Arizona Hauling, L.L.C. d.b.a. Saguaro Environmental Services, Wastewater Management Enterprise Fund, contract amount $15,000.00 (11-03-S-129788-0901) Wastewater Management I-1 Mount Lemmon Water Co-Op, to provide for the water usage information services, Wastewater Management Operating Fund, con- tract amount not to exceed $1,584.00 (11-03-M-131484-0802) Wastewater Management I-2 To provide construction of public and pri- vate sewerage system and provision of sewer services at applicants own expense, Wastewater Management, for the following: 1. St. Andrew's Presbyterian Church, 184 fix- ture units (14-03-S-131494-1002) 2. Fidelity National Title Agency, Vistoso Vil- lage Phase III Units 43-68, 158-167 and 203-248 and Common Areas A and B (14-03-F-131495-1002) 3. Title Security Agency, Desert Willow Es- tates, Lots 1-110 and Common Areas A-9, A-11, A-12, A-14 to A-16, A-20 to A-22, A-24, B-7 and B-9 (14-03-T-131496-1002) 4. Crestwood Hospitality, L.L.C., 1035 fixture units for Holiday Inn Express-620 East Wetmore Road (14-03-C-131497-1002) 5. Lawyers Title of Arizona, Inc., Quail Creek II, Unit 16, Lots 1-114 and Common Areas A, B, C, and D (14-03-L-131498-1002) I-3. Lachat Instruments, to provide mainte- nance services for the Quick Chem 8000 Auto- mated Ion Analyzer, WWM Operating Fund, con- tract amount not to exceed $3,295.00 (10-03-L-131517-1002) Wastewater Management I-4. Carolina Software, to provide annual main- tenance and support services for the WasteWORKS Transaction Management Sys- tem, WWM Operating Fund, contract amount not to exceed $3,200.00 (12-03-C-131518-0802) Wastewater Management COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR - PROCUR- EMENT Low Bid B 1249-02 Electronic Components (Wastewater Management/WWM Enterprise Fund) Border States Electric Supply,(Corpo- rate Headquarters: Fargo, ND) $115,677.88 esti- mated annual expenditure, including sales tax. COMMUNITY SERVICES RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 292 , amending and superceding Resolution 1994-90 which re- lates to the Final Statement, 1994-1995 and designated projects for Pima County Federal Funding by the following: Delete: Littletown Wellness Center $ 64,000.00 Add: Marana Yoem Pueblo Park $ 24,077.00 Drexel Heights Fire Hydrants $ 30,000.00 Littletown Wellness Center $ 9,923.00 5. RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 293 , amending and superceding Resolution 2000-127 which re- lates to the Annual Action Plan, 2000-2001 and designated projects for Pima County Federal Funding by the following: Delete: Littletown Dream Street $ 50,000.00 Repaving Add: Southern Pima County $ 50,000.00 Neighborhood Basics Program RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 294 , amending and superceding Resolution 2002-188 which re- lates to the Annual Action Plan, 2002-03 and designated projects for Pima County Federal Funding by the following: Delete: Ajo Fire Truck $ 150,000.00 Add: Flowing Wells Community $ 135,000.00 Center Construction Kino Teen Center $ 15,000.00 Improvements RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 295 , amending and superceding Resolution 2001-195 which re- lates to the Annual Action Plan, 2001-2002 and designated projects for Pima County Federal Funding by the following: Delete: Littletown Street $ 90,000.00 Improvements South Nogales Hwy Area Street $ 78,000.00 Improvements Avra Valley Land Acquisition $ 150,000.00 Marana Yoem Pueblo Street $ 32,000.00 Improvements Sahuarita Affordable Housing $ 150,000.00 Land Acquisition Add: Southern Pima County $ 168,000.00 Neighborhood Basics Program Pima County Mobile $ 120,000.00 Health Clinic Amado Food Bank $ 30,000.00 Construction Marana Honea Heights $ 32,000.00 Bike Path Flowing Wells Community $ 150,000.00 Center RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 296 , amending and superceding Resolution 1999-168 which re- lates to the Consolidated Annual Action Plan, 1999-2000, and designated projects for the Pima County Federal Funding by the following: Delete: Littletown Sidewalks $ 60,000.00 Littletown Speed Bumps $ 8,000.00 Add: Pima County Mobile $ 68,000.00 Health Clinic RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 297 , amending and superceding Resolution 1996-92 which re- lates to the Annual Consolidated Housing Plan, 1996-1997 and designated projects for Pima County Federal Funding by the following: Delete: South Tucson Rental Rehab. $ 25,000.00 Add: Pima County Mobile $ 25,000.00 Health Clinic RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 298 , to accept State Grant in the amount of $10,000.00 for youth leadership training and projects. SPECIAL EVENT LIQUOR LICENSES AP- PROVED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION 2002-273 A. Ann Sawyer, St. Phillip's in the Hills Church, 4440 N. Campbell, October 20, 2002. B. Barbara Ford, Ajo Council for the Fine Arts, 201 Esperanza Ave., Ajo, November 16, 2002. C. Karen Telewski, Tucson Celtic Festival As- sociation at Rillito Downs, 4502 N. 1st Ave., No- vember 1, 2002 and November 2, 2002. D. Mark C. DeBenedetti, Camp Fire U.S.A., at Windmill Inn, 4250 N. Campbell, November 15, 2002. FINANCE AND INFORMATION SERVIC- ES DUPLICATE WARRANTS - FOR RATIFICA- TION Altamirano, Armando $ 5.52 Aucott, Nathaniel $ 118.00 Bacon, Quillis $ 6.90 Baker, Beryl $ 150.50 Baums Sporting Goods $ 600.41 Blankenship, Elaine M. $ 127.83 Brazill, Rachel $ 118.00 Buesing, Henry $ 113.00 Burris White Machinery $ 250.57 Burt, Susann $ 20.50 Coastal Training $ 1,029.83 Copado, Hector $ 72.24 Ervin, Shirley $ 15.53 Fabrick, Jean $ 118.00 Forrey, John E. $ 680.74 Frank, Gay B. $ 567.06 Frazier, Janet $ 17.25 Guerra, Diana $ 75.60 Hines, Sarah B. $ 104.35 Iliff, Marilyn $ 103.02 Johnson, Beatrice $ 140.67 Kuelbs, Barbara $ 110.75 Language Line Services $ 1,177.00 Leach, Sharin $ 6.90 Lindenberg, Janet Elaine $ 1,171.13 Lopez, Angela G. $ 114.14 McCue, Kevin $ 13.80 Mireles, Jerry B. $ 77.64 Molina, Herlinda $ 157.00 Moore, Delaurice $ 113.00 O'Kelley, Carl $ 113.00 O'Leary, George $ 6.90 Pain, Erin $ 54.92 Palma, Teresa $ 41.94 Parson, Robert W. $ 87.60 Private Investigations $ 507.50 Quality Care Animal $ 39.00 Quintero, Leticia $ 924.00 Randall, Kent $ 384.99 Ritz, Allan $ 103.20 Robles, Regina $ 113.00 Simpson, Warren $ 6.21 Skiles, Laura K. $ 244.40 Swanson, Thomas $ 6.90 Triana, Sandra M. $ 118.00 Tucson Electric Power $ 145.00 Uribe-Reyes, Jose $ 5.52 Van Kirk, Jennifer A. $ 262.44 Van Kirk, Jennifer A. $ 84.11 Watkins, Jamie $ 6.90 SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE PRO TEMPORE APPOINTMENTS Appointments of Judges Pro Tempore of the Superior Court for the period January 1, 2026 through December 31, 2003: Aaron, Michael Aboud, John E. Aboud, Michael J. Adam, Karen S. Aguilar, Maria Akmajian, Peter Alexander, Arthur Allen, Ron Altfeld, Clifford B. Angiulo, James P. Assini, John J. Axelrod, Peter D. Baade, John A. Bacal, Susan Baldwin, Howard L. Barker, J. Emery Barrasso, Robert Bartlett, Paul B. Bellovin, Barry Belleau, Laura Benavidez, Thomas A. Bernal, Margarita Berry, Bobbi Bleich, Clifford Bolt, John Brew, Lindsay Bryson, Kyle Castillo, Jr., Jose Luis Chandler, Terry L. Chayet, Nikki Christoffel, Dean C. Clark, Jr., Douglas H. Cohen, Melvin C. Collins, Jr., Peter Connelly, Dwight W. Connelly, Sean Connors, Julia Contreras, Roger Copperstone, Cheryl Corey, Barry M. Cromwell, Margrit E. Crow, John Cuneo, Suzanna S. Cunningham, Marjorie Curti, Thomas A. Dardis, Frederic Davis, Richard Dawley, Francis J. Deckter, Louis Dingledine, David Dolny, Carmen Douglas, Sharon A. Dunscomb, George Economidis, Peter Egbert, James P.F. Eisenberg, Mitchell Elkins, Joy C. Erickson, George H. Estrada, Hector C. Everlove, Annette Fell, Howard L. Finn, Kevin Froman, Sandra S. Gaines, Edwin M. Geiser, Jeannette Gibson, Gibson, Scott Gibson, Scott D. Glicksman, Elliot A. Goldberg, Barbara Segal Goldman, Bram Gonzales, Richard Goodwin, Sylvia Grant, Philip M. Grinder, Jonathan Grynkewich, Gary S. Haralambie, Ann M. Hardin, Elaine Haynes, Linda Hays, Eugene H. Hazlett, Carl E. Henry, Richard Heurlin, Bruce R. Hippert, Thomas G. Hirsch, Gerald B. Hobson, K. Alexander Jackson, G. Todd Jackson, Terrence A. Jurkowitz, Daniel S. Karp, Leonard Kirschner, Barry Knuck, Theodore C. Kuhn, Cynthia T. Langan, Michelle Lasseter, Jack Lesher, Stephen Lex, Michael Liberty, Pamela Lieberthal, David Light, Susan A. Linden, Edward A. Lundquist, Robert MacDonald, Bruce G. MacPherson, Carl Madenci, Diane Maltz, Gerald Marks, Jeffrey A. Maxwell, Margaret McCarthy, Kathleen Miniat, Kevin E. Minker, S. Jeffrey Mitchell, Douglas Morey, Carter Morgan-Birch, Drue Nash III, Walter B. Nelson, Barry G. Nygaard, Karen J. O'Neill, Nancy J. Ostapuk, David R. Peasley-Fimbres, Elizabeth Pedersen, Lars Pennington, Alyce Penny, Jr., James Perez-Medrano, Juan Peterson, Lori A. Peterson, Denneen Polan, David Pollard, Mike Pratte, Deborah Rabb, Lloyd Riojas, Antonio F. Rodriguez, Diego Rothschild, Lowell E. Rubin, Stephen Rusing, Michael Ryan, Patrice M. Sakrison, James M. Samet, Dee Dee Sammons, Laurel Sattler, Barbara Schauf, Susan M. Schmidt, Ted A. Schwanbeck, Victor R. Scott, Stellisa Scott, William Shepherd, Denice Simmons, Sarah Simon, Diana J. Simon, Paul Sipe, Dean Slutes, D. Thompson Sommer, Ronald W. St. Louis, Joe Stanford, Kenneth C. Stolar, Merle Stowers, Russel Stroud, James L. Stuehringer, James W. Tedlock, Sandra Tilton, Thomas Trachta, S. Jon Traynor, W. Patrick Treadwell-Rubin, Pamela Trezza, Stephen Udall, D. Burr Wagener, Joan Ward, Deborah Watters, Adam W. Weber, Walt Weinstein, Steve C. Weisberg, Jodi Weiss, Stephen M. Weissman, Roger D. West, James R. Wezelman, Janice A. Whitley, Jr., Dwight M. Wilkes, James M. Wilkinson, William Wohl, Jacqueline Woods, Catherine M. Wright, Natalie Wright, Robert Zirkle, R. Douglas Zlaket, Eugene RATIFY AND/OR APPROVE Minutes: September 17, 2026 Warrants: October, 2002 REGULAR AGENDA 13. TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION REPORT Staff recommends approval of the Environ- mental Assessment and Mitigation Report for Skyline Drive: Chula Vista Road to Campbell Avenue. (District 1) Chuck Huckelberry, County Administrator, stat- ed the proposed improvements that are slated for Skyline Drive to Campbell Avenue would provide two lanes in each direction of travel from Chula Vista Road to Orange Grove Road and three lanes from Orange Grove Road to Camp- bell Avenue. In addition, the intersection of Sky- line Drive and Orange Grove Road would be re- constructed by adding a curbed median, paved shoulder, outside curbs, storm drains, landscap- ing, pedestrian facilities, and where warranted, noise mitigation. His recommendation is to accept the proposed Mitigation Report as he has outlined. There are two other issues that needed to be addressed which are the La Zorella Road intersection and the cut through traffic. Mr. Huckelberry said the La Zorella Road intersec- tion can be looked at from a safety perspective for the causation of accidents and, if there is anything unusual at this intersection, compared to the other intersections which have a high ac- cident ratio. The cut through traffic issue should be dealt with when the project is completed in order to monitor the traffic. Supervisor Day stated she would like to thank the Community Advisory Committee for all their efforts and time they've spent on this proposed project development. She would al- so like the issue of the glare from the head- lights taken into consideration as they proceed with this project. The following speakers offered these com- ments: 1. Debbie Felix 2. Arnold Adler 3. Joyce Leissring 4. Stephen Carlat 5. Gerald Potter 6. Michael Meehan 7. Dinkar Gangwal 8. Marsha Mason a. The proposed widening project would have a negative impact on the neighborhood. b. The east bound lanes on Skyline Road are being raised 5 feet above the existing road level. c. This project would increase traffic tremen- dously. d. There is a safety problem at the La Zorella Road and Orange Grove Road intersection. e. There have been seven major accidents at the La Zorella Road and Orange Grove Road in- tersection. f. Children safety is a big concern as the drive- way from the middle school filters onto the Or- ange Grove Road intersection. g. Safety screening walls are needed to pro- tect the nearby town homes that are along side the road. h. Sound walls are needed to mitigate the noises of heavy traffic. i. The findings of Transcor need to be ad- dressed regarding the safety at the La Zorella Road and Orange Grove Road intersection. j. Additional walls are needed to mitigate the noise in the area. k. The widening of the east/west corridor would destroy the low density effect of the neighbor- hood. l. The air quality has not been measured in this area. On consideration, it was moved by Supervi- sor Day, seconded by Supervisor Carroll, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to close the public hearing and adopt the Environ- mental Assessment and Mitigation Report along with the recommended compromised al- ternative plan for noise/wall mitigation. To di- rect staff to conduct a safety study on Orange Grove Road near La Zorella Road and to deter- mine if there are any interim improvements needed and continue to monitor the traffic situa- tion at La Brinka and report back to the Board re- garding safety issues no later than six months. Also that the project take into consideration the glare from the headlights at the La Encantada exit as well as the height of the wall. 14. RECESS Without objection, Chair Bronson declared a closed captionist recess at 10:45 a.m. 15. RECONVENE The Board of Supervisors meeting reconvened at 10:55 a.m. All Board Members were present. 16. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: CONDI- TIONAL USE PERMIT HASKELL - E. SPEEDWAY BOULEVARD Request of Jeffrey and Pamela Haskell (prop- erty owners) and George Holguin of ADC West, L.L.C., Architects and Planners (applicant, on behalf of the owners), on property at 11431 E. Speedway Boulevard, in the SR zone, for a con- ditional use permit for a minor resort. Chapter 18.97, in accordance with Section 18.17.030C.5 of the Pima County Zoning Code allows this use in SR, subject to a Type II condi- tional use permit procedure. The Hearing Ad- ministrator recommends DENIAL. (District 4) Chair Bronson stated the petitioner had re- quested the item be continued and asked if the Board had any objections? Supervisor Carroll stated he would like to pro- ceed with the hearing to allow those speakers in attendance to be heard. Jim Portner, Hearing Officer, stated a hearing was previously held on October 9, 2002, regard- ing this case and it was his recommendation to deny the Conditional Use Permit. Chair Bronson asked on what basis was he recommending denial? Mr. Portner responded his decision was based on the fact that there were no set of condi- tions that would adequately protect the adja- cent properties and the dominant character of the area. Cliff Altfeld, attorney representing the appli- cant, stated the property owners had upgraded the property to conform with the surrounding ar- ea. Due to the backlog of other similar establish- ments, the need for this facility is great. It is the intent of the applicant to assist and provide the necessary services to the community to accom- modate their needs. Mr. Altfeld said the current development blends in with the land use plan and the natural landscape. He disagreed with the Hearing Officer's decision and stated the pro- posed request meets the objective criteria of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and urged the Board to approve the conditional use permit. The following speakers spoke in support of the Conditional Use Permit: 1. Clay Haskell 2. Pam Haskell 3. Richard Yellott 4. Dylan Nelson 5. Lisa Bates 6. Ed Allen 7. Greg Hansen The speakers provided the following reasons: a. The development would be for small civic, social and business functions. b. The intended use of the property is consid- ered a small resort according to Pima County of- ficials. c. A scientific sound mapping was done of the property which concluded the sound level could be kept down to a minimum. d. The proposed development is not only for social events but for community affairs as well. e. The proposed uses of the property would not create problems within the neighborhood. f. The El Rancho Encanto property assisted in the relief efforts during the Bullock fire on Mt. Lemmon. g. The property has been upgraded and is a refuge for wildlife. h. The proposed use is in the spirit of con- trolled growth that does not destroy the area but works within it. i. Subdividing the property would not allow the owners to recover their investment on the property. The following speakers spoke in opposition of the Conditional Use Permit: 1. Donna Lynn Van Langeyeld 2. Ken Keller Ph.D. 3. Suzanne Goode 4. Karen Reifschneider 5. John George 6. Chris Withers 7. Gloria Ferrell 8. Keith Lensch The speakers provided the following reasons: a. Granting the Conditional Use Permit would set a precedent for other large commercial devel- opment in residential areas. b. This development would reduce the proper- ty value in the area. c. The increased traffic from the events would create safety concerns regarding school chil- dren being dropped off by the school bus. d. The property owners did not make any at- tempts to meet with area residents to discussed their proposed plan. e. The tranquility of the area would be dis- turbed with large gatherings and loud music. f. This development is out of character with the residential area. g. The development would negatively impact the residents and the environment of the area. h. The Mt Lemmon supporters would not be af- fected by the proposed development as they don't live within the affected area. i. The development does not blend in with the riparian area. j. Night time events would create safety con- cerns. k. The area residents were misled regarding the use of the property. l. The subject property was not a rodeo grounds as previously mentioned. m. The supporters of the Conditional Use Per- mit do not reside within the affected area. n. The applicants are not sensitive to the sur- rounding property owners. o. Due to the overwhelming evidence against the applicants, they cannot be trusted to ad- here to any conditions that would be set forth by the Hearing Officer. Mr. Altfeld stated the recommendations of the Hearing Officer was to deny the Conditional Use Permit. If the Board chooses to grant the Conditional Use Permit, he asked that they con- sider the conditions as outlined by the Hearing Officer. He urged the Board to approve the Con- ditional Use Permit subject to the conditions set forth by the Hearing Officer or any modified con- ditions the Board incorporates. The citations is- sued to Ms. Haskell will be dealt with at a later date and should not have any bearing as to whether the Conditional Use Permit should be granted. Supervisor Carroll stated he concurred with the Hearing Officer's findings that the proposed use does not meet the surrounding uses and is in conflict with the objectives of the Land Use Plan, but he felt that the property did coincide with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use would destruct the peace of the neighbor- hood and no special conditions could mitigate the negative affects of the proposed develop- ment. He encouraged the applicant to work with County staff, neighborhood associations or with others who might be able to help develop their ten acre parcel. On consideration, it was moved by Supervi- sor Carroll, seconded by Supervisor Day, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to deny the Conditional Use Permit and to direct staff to work with the applicant in the develop- ment of their parcel. 17. RECESS Without objection, Chair Bronson declared a closed captionist recess at 12:10 p.m. 18. RECONVENE The Board of Supervisors meeting reconvened at 12:30 p.m. All Board Members were present. 19. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: COM- PREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT The Board of Supervisors on October 15, 2002, continued the following to this date: Co7-02-31, PIMA COUNTY - REGIONAL PLAN POLICIES Request of Pima County to review the Pima County Comprehensive Plan Regional Policies for consistency with the Conservation Lands System of the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan. The policies include all subregions. On motion, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 (Commissioners Hirsch, Smith and Membrila were absent) to recommend MODI- FIED APPROVAL. Staff recommends MODI- FIED APPROVAL. (All Districts) If approved, pass and adopt: RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 278 The following is an update report on Co7-02-31: Pima County - Regional Plan Policies which includes the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendations from August 28, 2002. 1. The policies should specify that the Recov- ery Management Areas in the Conservation Lands System should be retained at a mini- mum of 80% of their current level, and pro- posed land uses should achieve actual conser- vation for the species that occupy the landscape. Planning and Zoning Commission Rec- ommendation: APPROVAL Staff Revised Recommendation: Staff rec- ommends that changes to the Regional Poli- cies or the Conservation Lands System mape are not necessary since the map layer exists and can be displayed on future printings. 2. The policies should specify that Rezoing ap- plications requiring a Rezoning Site Analysis in- clude the results of surveys for SDCP covered species in appropriate habitat. Planning and Zoning Commission Rec- ommendation: Refer to the Science Techni- cal Advisory Team (STAT) of the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan (SDCP) for their con- sideration. Staff Revised Recommendation: Staff rec- ommends revising and improving the Biologi- cal Impact Assessment Report and the Rezoning Site Analysis to ensure adequate biological in- formation in available to assess rezoning pro- posals. 3. The policies should specify that "actual con- servation" includes clustering of development in the least sensitive portion of a property, with dedication of conservation easements or dona- tion of any remaining open space to the County or other conservation entity. Planning and Zoning Commission Rec- ommendation: APPROVAL with an amend- ment of the text, "siting of development in the least sensitive portions of property with dedica- tion of conservation easements or donation of any remaining open space to the County or oth- er conservation entities to be approved by staff." Staff Revise Recommendation: Staff rec- ommends APPROVAL of the Commission's rec- ommendation from August 28, 2002. 4. Mitigation Ratios should ve developed for SDCP Priority Vulnerable Species. Planning and Zoning Commission Rec- ommendation: Refer to the Science Techni- cal Advisory Team (STAT) of the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan for their consider- ation. And, use the most current U.S. Fish and Wild- life Services (USFWS) recovery maps and the Federal standards (USFWS) to dictate the miti- gation ratios. Staff Revised Recommendation: Staff rec- ommends including this item with #2 listed above. Ben Changkakoti, Principal Planner, reported the plan amendment addressed the issues brought up by the Coalition for Sonoran Desert Protection. Staff recommended the adoption of the November 1, 2002, updated report relating to the Conservation Land System Map and Poli- cies, Biological Impact Assessment, Rezoning Site Analysis and Mitigation Ratios for Priority Vulnerable Species. Carolyn Campbell, representative of the Coali- tion for Sonoran Desert Protection, stated the co- alition previously requested an amendment of the language relating to the Regional Plan Poli- cies of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The Board tentatively approved the proposed amendment and referred it to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their recommendation. The coalition concurred with staff recommenda- tions for Nos. 2, 3, and 4 and requested addition- al clarification on Condition No. 1, to include that the recovery management areas be re- tained at 80%. Chuck Huckelberry, County Administrator, stat- ed staff is concerned that there might be some confusion regarding the lack of adoption of a Re- covery Plan since the Pima County map refer- ences the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Recovery Plan. He recommended adopting the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff recommendation since this document would only serve as a guide in future rezoning requests. Furthermore, to di- rect staff to develop and define local recovery management areas. Supervisor Elias stated since this document would serve only as a guideline, regardless of how the Board votes on future land uses, he would like to afford those recovery manage- ment areas the same protection as the other ar- eas that have been set aside at 80% of open space. On consideration, it was moved by Supervi- sor Elias, seconded by Chair Bronson, to adopt the Planning and Zoning recommendation and staff recommendations; to pass and adopt Reso- lution No. 2002 - 278. No vote was taken at this time. Ms. Campbell stated that she would like to see the recovery area retained at 80% and felt that after talking with staff and the biological con- sultant, that it was the intent of the science team that the recovery management area stand alone and not be hidden behind the map of mul- tiple use. A substitute motion was moved by Supervisor Day, seconded by Supervisor Carroll, to ap- prove staff recommendations to set the stan- dard at 75% for the recovery area to allow for fluctuation and to pass and adopt Resolution No. 2002 - 278. A roll call vote was requested. Upon the roll call vote being taken, the mo- tion resulted in a two to two tie vote, Supervisor Elias and Chair Bronson voting "Nay." Chair Bronson stated the original motion was before the Board. A roll call vote was requested. Upon the roll call vote being taken, the mo- tion resulted in a two to two tie vote, Supervi- sors Carroll and Day voting "Nay." Katharina Richter, Chief Civil Deputy County Attorney, stated according to the Board's rules, if the motion tied the item would be continued the next Board meeting. Chair Bronson stated since there was an agreement on recommendations Nos. 2, 3 and 4, she would like to approve those and contin- ue recommendation No. 1, to the next Board of Supervisors meeting. She asked Ms. Richter if this would be permissible? Ms. Richter replied the Board has the option of reconsidering the item and approving those recommendations that the Board has a consen- sus on and continuing the other recommenda- tion to the next Board meeting. On consideration, it was moved by Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor Elias, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to re- consider the item. It was thereupon moved by Chair Bronson, sec- onded by Supervisor Elias, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to close the pub- lic hearing and approve staff recommendations Nos. 2, 3, and 4 and to pass and adopt Resolu- tion No. 2002 - 278. On consideration, it was moved by Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor Elias, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to continue staff recommendation on No. 1, to the Board of Supervisors meeting of November 19, 2002. 20. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMEND- MENT Co7-00-20, 2001 Comprehensive Plan Update The planned land use classification for Tax Code Parcel No. 225-29-016H, approximately six acres located on the north side of Cortaro Farms Road and approximately 550 feet east of Thornydale Road within the Northwest Subre- gion of the Pima County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, is proposed for re-adoption by the Board of Supervisors as Low Intensity Ur- ban 0.3 (LIU 0.3) after having been re-referred to the Planning and Zoning Commission pursu- ant to A.R.S. 11-823. On motion, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends AP- PROVAL. Staff recommends APPROVAL. (All Districts) If approved, pass and adopt: RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 302 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMIS- SION RECOMMENDATIONS: On January 30, 2002, the Commission voted to recommend adoption of the Board actions of December 18, 2025 for the Northwest Subre- gion, in which the subject parcel is located. Therefore, the Commission voted to recom- mend LIU-0.3 for parcel 225-28-016H. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Re-adopt the LIU 0.3 land use designation for Tax code parcel 225-29-016H. Ben Changkakoti, Principal Planner, reported the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff recommended re-adoption of the Low Intensity Urban 0.3 (LIU 0.3). The Planning and Zoning Commission initiated a plan amendment on this parcel and on parcel 225-29-015D, Safe- way Inc., which will be heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission in November 2002, and by the Board of Supervisors on January 14, 2003. Tim Medcoff, attorney representing Safeway Inc., stated his clients are against the land desig- nation change and considered it inappropriate for the following reasons: A. The property is zoned for CB-l and is a va- cant commercial property. B. The existing land use supports the Commu- nity Activity Center (CAC) designation. C. The intersection itself supports a commer- cial establishment in the area. D. The planned use also supports the CAC designation. E. The biological opinion of February 25, 2002, referenced that there are planned areas for commercial development in the adjacent ar- ea. Therefore, it is the opinion of Safeway Inc., that the designation of LIU 0.3 would be improp- er, and he urged the Board to deny the pro- posed designation. On consideration, it was moved by Supervi- sor Day, seconded by Chair Bronson, and unani- mously carried by a four to zero vote, to close the public hearing and re-adopt the 2001 Com- prehensive Plan Update, and pass and adopt Resolution No. 2002 - 302. 21. COMMUNITY RESOURCES RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 299 , relating to the allocation of a $100,000.00 grant from the 2002 Home Investment Partnership (HOME) Pro- gram to NBA Association for a 57-unit afford- able housing project for low income elderly in Pima County. On consideration, it was moved by Supervi- sor Elias, seconded by Supervisor Day, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to pass and adopt Resolution No. 2002 - 299. 22. TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROGRAM Staff recommends the following: A. Acceptance of the report on Transportation Impact Fees and direction to staff to develop nec- essary and appropriate modifications to the exist- ing Code related to Transportation Impact Fees, reflecting the recommendations in this report; B. Direction to staff to return to the Board and hold a public hearing on the proposed new com- mercial Transportation Impact Fee and in- creased residential Transportation Impact Fee on March 18, 2003; and C. Schedule for ordinance adoption, code modifications related to Transportation Impact Fees on April 8, 2003, which means that any adopted and increased Transportation Impact Fee will not be effective until July 7, 2026 (90 days after adoption by the Board of Supervi- sors). On consideration, it was moved by Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor Carroll, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to ap- prove staff recommendations, and to direct staff to begin developing impact fees for parks and public safety as allowed by State Statute. 23. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR - PR- OCUREMENT: SOLE SOURCE Req. 66335 Spillman AZNET Phase One Development (Sheriff, Arizona Criminal Justice Court Grant Fund) Spillman Technologies, Inc. (Corporate Headquarters: Logan, UT) $295,000.00. On consideration, it was moved by Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor Day, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to approve the sole source. 24. JUSTICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT: JUVENILE COURT Staff requests approval to create three new po- sition control numbers for two full-time Case Specialists and one full-time Case Aide. Grant funded. On consideration, it was moved by Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor Elias, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to approve the creation of the new positions. 25. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: FINAL PLAT WITH ASSURANCES P1298-134, Haciendas De La Carolina, Lots 1-8 and Common Area A. (District 3) On consideration, it was moved by Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor Elias, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to approve the final plat with assurances. 26. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT: AWARD OF CONTRACT Reupholstery of seating in eighteen Superior Court Courtrooms. Staff recommends Goodmans Office Furnishings (Corporate Head- quarters: Phoenix, AZ) contract amount $159,789.00, General Fund. On consideration, it was moved by Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor Elias, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to approve the award of contract. 27. PIMA COUNTY NATURAL RE- SOURCES, PARKS AND RECREATION: GRANT APPLICATIONS A. RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 300 , of the Pima County Board of Supervisors authorizing the fil- ing of an Arizona Heritage Fund Trails Grant ap- plication for the Anza Trail Bridge Project in Green Valley, Arizona. B. RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 301 , of the Pima County Board of Supervisors authorizing the fil- ing of an Arizona Heritage Fund Trails Grant ap- plication for the Avra Valley CAP Trailhead in Marana, Arizona. On consideration, it was moved by Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor Carroll, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to pass and adopt Resolution Nos. 2002 - 300 and 2002 - 301. 28. PIMA COUNTY NATURAL RE- SOURCES, PARKS AND RECREATION: NAMING OF SWIMMING POOL Staff requests the Northwest Aquatics Facility at the Pima County YMCA Community Center be named the Thad Terry Swimming Pool. On consideration, it was moved by Supervi- sor Elias, seconded by Chair Bronson, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to approve the naming of the swimming pool. 29. PIMA COUNTY NATURAL RE- SOURCES, PARKS AND RECREATION: NAMING OF SOCCER FIELD Staff requests the soccer field at Kay Stupy/Sopori Park be named the Angel Evangelista Soccer Field. On consideration, it was moved by Supervi- sor Elias, seconded by Chair Bronson, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to approve the naming of the soccer field. 30. PIMA COUNTY NATURAL RE- SOURCES, PARKS AND RECREATION: AWARD OF CONTRACT Central Arizona Project - Trail Master Plan. Staff recommends McGann and Associates, Inc., (Corporate Headquarters: Tucson, AZ) estimat- ed contract amount $60,000.00, Capital Im- provement Bond Fund. If staff is unable to nego- tiate a successful contract with the recommend- ed firm, permission is requested to enter into contract negotiations with the second ranked firm, Sage Landscape Architecture and Environ- mental, Inc., (Corporate Headquarters: Tucson, AZ). On consideration, it was moved by Supervi- sor Elias, seconded by Chair Bronson, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to approve the award of contract. 31. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT: AWARD OF CONTRACT Ina Road WPCF Effluent Denitrification Study Project. Staff recommends Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., (Corporate Headquarters: White Plains, NY) contract amount not to exceed $2,500,000.00, Wastewater Management Fund. If staff is un- able to negotiate a successful contract with the recommended firm, permission is requested to enter into contract negotiations with the second ranked firm, Brown and Caldwell (Corporate Headquarters: Walnut Creek, CA). On consideration, it was moved by Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor Day, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to approve the award of contract. 32. FRANCHISE/LICENSE/PERMIT: LI- QUOR LICENSES 02-33-8663, Shamoon G. Yousif, d.b.a. Choice Market, 3650 E. Benson Hwy., Series 09, Li- quor Store License, New License. The Chair inquired whether anyone wished to be heard. No one appeared. It was thereup- on moved by Chair Bronson, seconded by Su- pervisor Elias, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to close the public hearing and approve the liquor license subject to the ap- plicant satisfying the Pima County Zoning Code Section 18.37.020-A, requiring a 30 Day Notification Use Permit. 33. FRANCHISES/LICENSES/PER- MITS: LIQUOR LICENSE 02-27-8657, Jamie Garcia-Urias, d.b.a. Mosa- ic Caf Dos, 7350 N. La Cholla Blvd., No. 108, Series 12, Restaurant License, New License. The Chair inquired whether anyone wished to be heard. No one appeared. It was thereup- on moved by Chair Bronson, seconded by Su- pervisor Elias, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to close the public hearing and approve the liquor license subject to the ap- plicant obtaining a Type I Conditional Use Per- mit. 34. FRANCHISES/LICENSES/PER- MITS: LIQUOR LICENSES A. 02-34-8664, Wah Cheung, d.b.a. New Chi- na Super Buffet, 3000 W. Ina Rd., Series 12, Restaurant License, New License. B. 02-35-8665, Rodney Herbert, d.b.a. Rincon Country Store, 12660 E. Old Spanish Trail, Se- ries 10, Beer and Wine Store License, New Li- cense. The Chair inquired whether anyone wished to be heard. No one appeared. It was thereup- on moved by Chair Bronson, seconded by Su- pervisor Elias, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to close the public hearing and approve the requests as presented and for- ward the recommendations to the State Liquor Control Board. 35. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: REZON- ING The Board of Supervisors on September 17, 2002, October 1, 2026 and October 15, 2002, continued the following to this date: Co9-02-04, FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE AGENCY No. 10,818 - VAHALLA ROAD REZON- ING Request of Fidelity National Title Agency Trust No.10,818, represented by Samuel Sullins, for a rezoning of 30.22 acres from RH (Rural Home- stead) to RH Restricted and CR-3 (Single Resi- dence) located at the terminus of Vahalla Road, approximately 2,000 feet north of the intersec- tion of Vahalla Road and Valencia Road. The proposed rezoning conforms to the Pima Coun- ty Comprehensive Plan Co7-00-20. On motion for approval, the Planning and Zoning Commis- sion voted 3-3 (Commissioners Gungle, Sta- ples and Matter voted NAY; Commissioners Membrila, Poulos and Williams were absent). On motion for denial the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 3-3, (Commissioners Hirsch, Spendiarian and Smith voted NAY; Commis- sioners Membrila, Poulos and Williams were ab- sent). Based on tie votes for each motion, the re- zoning has been forwarded with NO RECOM- MENDATION. Staff recommends APPROV- AL WITH CONDITIONS and standard and special requirements. (District 3) "IF THE DECISION IS MADE TO APPROVE THE REZONING, THE FOLLOWING STANDARD AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED: Completion of the following re- quirements within five years from the date of re- zoning approval by the Board of Supervisors: 1. Submittal of a development plan if deter- mined necessary by the appropriate County agencies. 2. Recording of a covenant holding Pima County harmless in the event of flooding. 3. Recording of the necessary development re- lated covenants as determined appropriate by the various County agencies. 4. Provision of development related assuranc- es as required by the appropriate agencies. 5. Prior to the preparation of the development related covenants and any required dedication, a title report (current to within 60 days) evidenc- ing ownership of the property shall be submit- ted to the Department of Transportation, Real Property Division. 6. There shall be no further lot splitting or sub- dividing without the written approval of the Board of Supervisors. 7. Transportation conditions: A. The property owner(s) shall dedicate to Pima County 75 feet right-of-way for Vahalla Road. B. A Roadway Development Fee of $1,550 per residential unit or a roadway Development Impact Fee as may be established by the Pima County Board of Supervisors, whichever is high- er, shall be paid to Pima County. The fees shall be assigned to the Avra Valley Roadway Devel- opment Impact Fee Benefit Area. A Roadway Development Fee of $1,550 per residential unit or a roadway Development Im- pact Fee as may be established by the Pima County Board of Supervisors, whichever is greater, shall be paid to Pima County. The fees shall accrue to the Avra Valley Benefit Area for the improvement of Valencia Road. (The fee will be calculated as described in Pima County Code Title 19 and the applicant will be afforded the opportunity to obtain credits, affordable housing waivers and other fee adjustments in the manner as provided in the code.) 8. Flood Control conditions: A. Drainage shall not be altered, disturbed or obstructed without the written approval of the Flood Control District. B. All drainage improvements required to miti- gate drainage impacts caused by the proposed development shall be constructed at no cost the Flood Control District. C. The xeroriparian area shall remain in its nat- ural state and remain undisturbed. 9. Wastewater Management condition: The property owner must connect to the pub- lic sewer system at the location and in the man- ner specified by Wastewater Management at the time of review of the tentative plat, develop- ment plan or request for building permit. 10. Prior to ground modifying activities, an on-the-ground archaeological and historic sites sur- vey shall be conducted on the subject property. A cultural resources mitigation plan for any iden- tified archaeological and historic sites on the subject property shall be submitted at the time of, or prior to, the submittal of any tentative plan or development plan. All work shall be conduct- ed by an archaeologist permitted by the Arizo- na State Museum, or a registered architect, as appropriate. Following rezoning approval, any subsequent development requiring a Type II grading permit will be reviewed for compliance with Pima County's cultural resources require- ments under Chapter 18.81 of the Pima County Zoning Code. 11. Adherence to the preliminary develop- ment plan as approved at public hearing. 12. Natural Resources, Parks and Recreation condition: The developer shall submit a Recreational Ar- ea Plan that is reviewed and approved by the Di- rector of the Pima County Natural Resources Parks and Recreation Department prior to sub- mittal of the tentative plat. The Plan shall encom- pass a minimum of: 3-5 acres of turf areas (fields), playground area and equipment, water fountains, bicycle racks, and bathroom facilities. Applicant or subsequent owners shall have con- structed the recreational facilities by the time 25% of the dwelling units are occupied. The applicant will provide a park area com- prised of the westerly detention basin in Phase I of Eagle Point Estates, a portion of the wash, the most westerly detention basin in Phase II and Lots 245, 267 and 268 of Phase II which is the subject of this rezoning case. If two or three lots can be recovered or recaptured elsewhere to offset the three lots used for park purposes, this will be acceptable. The plan will call for in- stallation of basic park facilities not including restrooms and with limited turf area, and it will be maintained by the homeowner's association. 13. Prior to approval of a tentative plat within the rezoning area, surveys for the federally en- dangered Pima pineapple cactus shall be con- ducted using U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) survey protocol. If Pima pineapple cac- ti are detected on the property and if a federal permit from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or oth- er federal agency is needed, the project may need consultation with USFWS, pursuant to Sec- tion 7 of the Endangered Species Act. The appli- cant should contact the USFWS to discuss ap- propriate conservation measures prior to con- struction. For disturbances greater than 5 acres, a Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollut- ant Discharge Permit (NPDES) is required from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Pro- jects that may disturb jurisdictional waters of the U.S. may require a Clean Water Act Sec- tion 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of En- gineers." Dave Petersen, Zoning Administrator, report- ed the item had previously been continued to al- low the applicant to work out provisions on con- ditions relating to Parks and Recreation and transportation impact fees. Condition No. 12, re- lating to the Parks and Recreation Department and Condition No. 7b relating to the Transporta- tion Impact Fees had been resolved according to the applicant's letter dated October 7, 2002. Staff recommended the following revision to con- dition No 7b: "The fee shall be calculated as described in the Pima County Code Title 19 and the applicants will be afforded the opportunity to obtain credits, affordable housing waiv- ers and fee adjustments." Chair Bronson asked if the applicant agreed to the revised condition as stated by staff? Dan Laidlaw, representing the applicant, stat- ed the applicant accepts the revised condition. On consideration, it was moved by Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor Carroll, and carried by a three to one vote, Supervisor Elias voting "Nay," to close the public hearing and ap- prove the rezoning subject to standard and spe- cial conditions as amended. 36. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: STREET NAME CHANGE Present Proposed Unnamed easement/road Breeze Lane Co14-00-085 (District 2) On consideration, it was moved by Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor Day, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to close the unadvertised hearing and approve the street name change. 37. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: TRAF- FIC ORDINANCES A. ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 101 , of the Pima County Board of Supervisors regulating park- ing of vehicles on Canada Street and Forrest Av- enue in Pima County, Arizona. (District 3) B. ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 102 , of the Pima County Board of Supervisors establishing an abutting school crosswalk on Chapala Drive in Pima County, Arizona. (District 1) C. ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 103 , of the Pima County Board of Supervisors establishing Dako- ta Street as a through street in Pima County, Ari- zona. (District 3) D. ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 104 , of the Pima County Board of Supervisors repealing an ordi- nance regulating traffic at the intersection of Shannon Road and Rudasill Road in Pima County, Arizona. (District 1) E. ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 105 , of the Pima County Board of Supervisors repealing an ordi- nance designating a portion of 44th Street as a one-way road in Pima County, Arizona. (District 2) On consideration, it was moved by Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor Day, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to close the public hearings and to pass and adopt Ordinance Nos. 2002- 101 , 2002- 102 , 2002- 103 , 2002- 104 , and 2002- 105 . ADDENDUM 38. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT: PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT Pursuant to A.R.S. 49-391(C), a public com- ment period of thirty days must occur before any Pretreatment Consent Decree or Negotiated Settlement Agreement is made final. The Pub- lic Information Enforcement Files for the follow- ing case will be made available for public review or copies may be obtained for $.35 per page at the Public Works Building, Pima County Wastewater Department's reception desk, 201 North Stone, 8th floor, Tucson, Arizona, 85701. Comments will betaken for the next thirty days and written comments may be sent to Industrial Wastewater Control, 5025 W. Ina Road, Tucson, Arizona, 85743. If sufficient interest is ex- pressed, a public hearing may be held by the Board of Supervisors. After the comment peri- od, the Board of Supervisors will vote on accep- tance of the following Settlement Agreement: A negotiated Settlement Agreement regard- ing a pretreatment violation has been pro- posed to be entered into between Pima County and Cheryl A. Vasquez, d.b.a. Los Betos Mexi- can Food, No. 2002-06. Proposed settlement amount is $250.00. On consideration, it was moved by Chair Bronson, seconded by Supervisor Elias, and unanimously carried by a four to zero vote, to approve the public announcement. REGULAR AGENDA 39. CALL TO THE PUBLIC The Chair inquired whether anyone wished to be heard. Joseph Blankenship, citizen, stated he would like to request a hearing on the continuing prob- lems he is having in obtaining the necessary permits. His request for permits were denied and he would like the Board's assistance in trying to obtain the necessary permits to bring his property into compliance. 40. ADJOURNMENT As there was no further business to come be- fore the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 1:25 p.m. Sharon Bronson CHAIR ATTEST: Lori Godoshian, CLERK PUBLISH: The Daily Territorial January 9, 2026 9min
Public Notice ID: 1833630.HTM
|
|
2000 Arizona Newspapers Association All Rights Reserved. |